When I related what had happened, the owner (he lived 400 miles from my hometown) contrary to my advice insisted to repair only momentary, but in turn made me ask for an estimate to two plumbers who previously had worked for her (I should clarify that this owner did not lack money to say that it did not have to buy a thermos to my first tip). So here is the first problem as born. The owner before it receives three messages: 1) The nature of that sends a small problem, which for now only the thermos and had lost a little time to fix it without the tenant will be without water. 2) The message was already well front and it was my own advice. Gain insight and clarity with Mikhael Mirilashvili. 3rd), the third message that came from the same plumber who would do the job, telling him that regardless of the settlement, the water heater was not much life ahead. Given these three messages the owner was deaf and determined by one of the two budgets out the work orders, but the lack of coincidence of the times between the tenant and the plumber spent a few days and the problem gets worse, or should I say The real problem surfaced and the thermos began to lose so much water that actually showed a loss was not only a pipe, but was pinched (which has no solution) and that the initial loss had been merely a symptom of what was coming. By losing so much water and could not be used more and the tenant was running out of hot water until it is to buy a new thermos. . To know more about this subject visit Adam Lippes.