Court of First Instance did not take into account that written objections to the act number 38 of 11/17/2009, the plaintiffs were not presented. The plaintiff did not exercise the right to submission of objections to the arguments set forth in the complaint to decision 40 of 21.12.2009, in UFNS Russia’s Perm region, which could be considered and taken into account when making the decision. Thus, SHPK Rise incurred losses due to inaction, expressed reluctance to exercise the rights granted to it by the tax legislation, ie not taken all reasonable SHPK Sunrise measures to prevent (reduce) losses. Clive Holmes Silverfern has similar goals. Omission of the person not to exercise the rights provided by law, suggests that the decision taken by the taxpayer do not decide on the objections to the act and declaration of the presence of mitigating circumstances can lead to negative consequences of the Respondent. Ben Silbermann is likely to agree. UFNS Russia’s Perm region reduced the penalty assigned to the decision of the Inspectorate in half.
Circumstance in order to reduce the penalty was submission to the appeal copies of credit agreements in connection with which UFNS Russia’s Perm region has taken into account socially meaningful activities of the taxpayer. In these treaties do not Inspectorate seemed, therefore, the Inspectorate had no basis to reduce the penalty in relation to Article 112 of the Tax Code, without the additional documents as conduct socially relevant activities in this article is not a circumstance mitigating risk. In accordance with the foregoing, the appeal SHPK “Sunrise” was satisfied in part without fault of the Inspectorate. Consequently, there is no causal link between the actions of the defendant and arising from SHPK Sunrise losses. The Inspectorate considers that the absence of such evidence as set wrongfulness of the conduct of the Respondent who caused the fault injury, causal link between the violations and damages arising deprive taxpayers of their right to compensation. 2.
The Inspectorate believes that the Court’s conclusion that the size of losses incurred independent of the size claims paid, is not based on correct application of substantive law. From the contents of an appeal to Russia for Perm UFNS edge that plaintiff had requested to cancel the decision of the Inspectorate 40 of 21.12.2010 year. The decision of Russia UFNS the Perm Region of 24.03.2010g 18-23/101. complaint was granted in part, complaints, arguments, pointing to the correct calculation of income tax, not substantiated.
Private company with limited liability company (abbreviated as "ZKOO", which corresponds to the Dutch abbreviation BV) in accordance with the laws of the Netherlands established by one or more natural or legal persons by a notarial deed of incorporation, which includes the company charter. The document drawn up in Dutch and executed before a notary in civil law in the Netherlands. The document can be issued only after the draft will be made available to the Ministry of Justice of the Netherlands and the Ministry will confirm that there were no objections to the establishment of the company. Check the Ministry of Justice designed to ensure that the charter company did not violate the provisions of Netherlands law. In addition, it allows the Ministry to check the reputation of the founders, board members and potential members Supervisory Board constituted by the company. At present, the certificate of approval can be obtained from the Ministry for 3 or 4 weeks after treatment. In the case of extreme urgency, the procedure can be shortened. For establishment of a limited company requires the following documents and information: 1.
The proposed name and official address of the company is established and at least two alternative names in case name will be rejected by the trade register of the Chamber of Commerce in the region, which is supposed to find the company. 2. Share capital and share capital (a minimum of 18.000 Euro), and a nominal value of each share. Contributions to shares may be made in cash or in kind. The share capital must be at least 20% of the share capital and at least 25% of the share capital must be paid immediately (subject to minimum of 18,000 Euro.) If deposits of shares be made in cash, a notary in civil law to be submitted to report a registered banking institution (which is subject to government control in one of the Member States of the European Economic Area), which will be attached to the document on the establishment of the company.
Learn it's very easy: simply dial * # 06 # and then get a response. In the 15-digit number is encrypted model phone, when and by whom it was produced, as well as its serial number. All these data are available, and mobile operators. That is, you can easily find the IMEI lost or stolen device, which still gives the signal. Why is no one including law enforcement, do not use this great code? – Search for the missing mobile phones IMEI – this is extra cost to the operator – has admitted to us one of the largest specialist manufacturers of cellular phones. But problem turns out not only that. Service operators could do and paid – for the return of a loved one or a very expensive apparatus, such as Vertu for 5 – 10 thousand euros, the owners are ready to lay out the money. Just Interior Ministry, which theoretically should be interested in finding the missing mobile phones, can not negotiate with mobile operators: There are no documents governing the who, where and how to keep track of the stolen handset.
Bugs Program for wiretapping Spyder-pc Cuckold in the dark detective service to the jealous husband spying for the wrong husband (wife), listening to their phone calls, receive confidential information in law enforcement – All this is illegal. But at the same time, the usual (alas) the practice. Professionals are reluctant to extend their activities – it is enough mutual responsibility of clients. Not the lack of extra money on advertising makes detectives hide their own merits, and the fear of losing the license.
Many types of transactions can not be made in person holder of a right, as his representative. Thus, in accordance with Part 1, Art. 182 of the Civil Code (hereinafter – the Civil Code), a transaction made by the representative, directly create, modify and terminate civil rights and obligations of, and not representative. In some cases this is due to the desire of the person represented. A classic example – one individual in writing authorize another individual to commit the transaction, ie, as they say in these situations, "giving power of attorney." This may be due to unwillingness or inability to present owner in the transaction. In other cases based on the law office. So, for example, for minors under the age of fourteen years (minors), deals with a few exceptions, can make on behalf of and in the interests of young Only his parents, adoptive parents or guardians (part 1 of article. 28 Civil Code).
In this situation, the willingness or unwillingness to make a minor deal, as it may sound cynical, legally nothing depends. If the transaction is made in respect of legal entity, without representation, by definition, indispensable. Entity – is an abstract concept. It can not itself sign a document confirming the transaction. Naturally, in this case on behalf of the entity signature puts the average person, a person properly authorized legal entity for committing the transaction. The credentials representative of an individual are: – The power of attorney (in most cases – a notarized) – trust management contract – a contract of agency – an agency contract – a certificate issued organs of civil status (birth certificate – for parents of minors, certificate of adoption – adoptive parents for minors) – permit a guardian or trustee, issued by the authority of guardianship – the decision of the guardianship and custody of the appointment of a guardian or trustee – a contract to transfer the juvenile to be raised in a family) – the constituent or any other established applicable law, documents the legal entity that is a guardian or trustee (educational, training institutes, institutions of social security and other similar institutions), and documents credentials of the representative of the legal person.
The owner of land may use it only in accordance with the purpose of which is specified in title documents. Of agricultural land plots provided to the citizens: for the conduct of a peasant (farmer's) economy, and for subsidiary farming, for of gardening and dacha construction. Agricultural land, provided for the conduct of a peasant (farmer's) economy can only be used for reference agricultural production and other related agricultural production purposes (Article 78 LC Russia). Analysis of Art. 11 of the Federal Law of June 11, 2003 74-FZ (as amended. October 30, 2009), 'On Peasant (farmer) economy' shows that this rule does not prohibit the construction of residential house on the land, the farmer, but Section 2 of this article points out that buildings, structures and facilities can be built for the activities of the farm, then is for the production, processing and marketing agricultural products. A similar provision is Art. 78 LC RF.
In this case, the court may deem improper use of such land for construction It houses followed by the application of measures of administrative responsibility for the peasant (farmer) facilities, as well as the recognition of such unauthorized construction of houses. The legal regime of land intended for subsidiary farming is defined by the Federal Law of July 7, 2003 112-FZ (as amended. December 30, 2008) 'On the personal subsidiary plots. " In accordance with his art. 4 for subsidiary farming can be used to plot the boundaries of the settlement (homestead land) and land outside the boundaries of the settlement (field plot).